I thought about that but would prefer not to mess around with acl etc.
But at least it's a workaround.
Wouldn't it be a real requirement to be able to clearly define a certain drive as remote?
Another example:
eSATA is there since years and we can't use it properly with X1.
According to your support, it's beacause how Windows handles the drives.
As windows offers the option to disconnect such a drive,
it knows that it is a remote drive...
However - there should be a manual option to "keep" an index, even if a drive is disconnected.
No matter what kind of drive it is.
Wouldn't you agree?
But at least it's a workaround.
Wouldn't it be a real requirement to be able to clearly define a certain drive as remote?
Another example:
eSATA is there since years and we can't use it properly with X1.
According to your support, it's beacause how Windows handles the drives.
As windows offers the option to disconnect such a drive,
it knows that it is a remote drive...
However - there should be a manual option to "keep" an index, even if a drive is disconnected.
No matter what kind of drive it is.
Wouldn't you agree?